Close X

Blog

State Farm Spanked By Indiana Court Of Appeals

Posted by Guy DiMartino | Oct 31, 2014 | 0 Comments

Michigan City car accident lawyer discusses recent Indiana Court of Appeals opinion that highlights State Farm's unreasonableness in some circumstances.

State Farm is the largest automobile insurer in the nation.  It is certainly the big boy on the block and sometimes it likes to wheel its muscle. In the recent case of State Farm v. Young the court did not allow it to bully folks injured in an automobile accident.

Facts of the Case

A guy was injured in a car crash when he was rear-ended by Young.  He received medical treatment for his injuries.  Most of the medical expenses were paid by two insurance companies.  First, the vehicle he was driving in was covered under a policy of insurance with State Farm that had $5,000.00 in medical payments coverage.  Med-Pay provides the first line of medical payments for folks injured in car accident.  The remaining $19,000.00 was paid by the injured person's health insurance.

When somebody is involved in a car accident and their insurance policy pays for the medical expenses they are entitled to repayment of a portion of the money from the injured person's settlement.

The injured guy filed a lawsuit and at mediation, Young's insurance company (State Farm).  So State Farm was on both sides of the claim.  Young had an insurance policy of $100,000 and the company settled the claim for about $17,000.00.  The injured guy's attorney asked the insurance companies (State Farm being one) to accept 17% of their lien amount.  The health insurance agreed but State Farm did not.  State Farm wanted about $3,200, which included a statutory reduction for the injured person's attorney's fees.

The Court's Ruling

The court looked at the facts and said that it is clear the injured person did not get the full value of his claim because the claim settled for about $7,000.00 less than the total medical bills paid.  Additionally, the court said that the purpose of subrogation is to avoid unjust enrichment, and in this case, it reduced State Farm's lien to $581.00.  If State Farm were to receive $3,200.00 it would have been the one that was unjustly enriched in this matter.

The appellate court did not set out the facts showing why the underlying settlement was only $17,000.00, but it appears that State Farm was being pretty unreasonable regarding its subrogation interest in this matter.

If you have any questions about subrogation or a claim against State Farm, contact one of our Michigan City Car Accident lawyers at (219) 874-4878 or fill out the internet consultation form on the right.

About the Author

Guy DiMartino

I have loved helping people in need for almost three decades.  It has been my privilege to serve people as their pastor, chiropractor, and lawyer.  The current focus of my legal practice and lifes passion is helping the seriously injured receive complete compensation for their injuries. I am a ...

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Sample

Book icon 1

Guide To Indiana Car Accident Claims

Navigating The Mine Field

FREE DOWNLOAD

Sample

Book icon 2

Indiana Slip, Trip & Fall Claims

The Inside Story

FREE DOWNLOAD

Sample

Book icon 3

Understanding Indiana Truck Accidents

Frequently Asked Questions

FREE DOWNLOAD